Some Thoughts on Objectivity, Subjectivity and Interpretation (1)

This was a recent Quora question and it keeps puzzling me. Is reality subjective or objective? If it is subjective is every interpretation of it correct? It is not that difficult to reject this question as what it is: an assumption supported by an... Read More | Share it now!

Continue reading

Share

Lessons from Ludwig Wittgenstein and Alan Turing’s Debate on Mathematical Ontology

Ludwig Wittgenstein, Wittgenstein’s Lectures on the Foundations of Mathematics Cambridge, 1939, ed. by Cora Diamond (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1989), 300 pages. Publisher’s link. This is the first in a series of posts, outlining... Read More | Share it now!

Continue reading

Share

Further thoughts on Tractatus 5.1361 | by Gary Smith

I think that is a very useful distinction you have made between “as soon as”, “always when” and “because”.  Let me try to explain “because” as I understand it.  Take a moment in time t1. (Actually there are no such things as moments... Read More | Share it now!

Continue reading

Share

Logical positivism debunked (2): falsifications beat verifications – Karl Popper’s victory

continuing: Logical positivism debunked (1): The philosophy that cannot even prove that its own statements have a “meaning”   In the Laundry. You are handed back your belongings all washed, and you notice that this is not your jacket. Actually... Read More | Share it now!

Continue reading

Share

Logical positivism debunked (1): The philosophy that cannot even prove that its own statements have a “meaning”

Logical positivism: all statements that can't be empirically verified are meaningless. — Ryan (@ryan_the_kang) March 11, 2014 Response to logical positivism: you can't empirically verify that claim… — Ryan (@ryan_the_kang)... Read More | Share it now!

Continue reading

Share